From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 17, 2004
869 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 4D04-711.

Opinion filed March 17, 2004. Rehearing Denied April 26, 2004.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Ana I. Gardiner, Judge, L.T. Case Nos. 00-5860CF10A, 01-2336CF10A and 01-8556CF10A.

Earl Holmes, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


The order denying the motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed. The initial brief filed in this appeal raises claims that were not presented in the motion below. Affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to raise these claims by proper motion in the trial court. See Penrod v. State, 621 So.2d 473 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). See generally Finney v. State, 660 So.2d 674, 683 (Fla. 1995) (stating that in order to be cognizable on appeal, claims must first be raised in the trial court).

GUNTHER, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Holmes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 17, 2004
869 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Holmes v. State

Case Details

Full title:EARL L. HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 17, 2004

Citations

869 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)