From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 20, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1234 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 501528.

September 20, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

David Holmes, Napanoch, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


At the conclusion of a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of a movement regulation violation. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting the commencement of this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and petitioner's hearing testimony ( see Matter of Fontaine v Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, 35 AD3d 1113, 1113-1114, appeal dismissed 8 NY3d 943; Matter of Kalwasinski v Goord, 31 AD3d 1081, 1082). With respect to petitioner's claim of hearing officer bias, it is unpreserved for our review given his failure to raise it on his administrative appeal and, in any event, is without merit ( see Matter of Townes v Goord, 32 AD3d 1136, 1137). As for petitioner's assertion regarding irregularities in the hearing transcript, "such deficiencies are not so significant as to preclude meaningful judicial review" ( Matter of Daniels v Goord, 31 AD3d 1076, 1077).

Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent preserved, have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Holmes v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 20, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1234 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Holmes v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID HOLMES, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM BROWN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 20, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 1234 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6776
841 N.Y.S.2d 716

Citing Cases

Quinones v. Fischer

Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the determination in this regard ( see Matter of Garcia v Goord,…

In re Vincent Gomez

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with petitioner's testimony in which he admitted to possessing…