From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Bell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1911
94 N.E. 1094 (N.Y. 1911)

Opinion

Argued January 4, 1911

Decided January 24, 1911

Rastus S. Ransom for appellant.

Frederick E. Mygatt, William M. Wherry, Jr., and Frederick Van Wyck for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; first question certified answered in the negative; second question answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Holmes v. Bell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1911
94 N.E. 1094 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for

Holmes v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:ARTEMAS H. HOLMES, Appellant, v . HELEN V. BELL et al., Respondents…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 24, 1911

Citations

94 N.E. 1094 (N.Y. 1911)
94 N.E. 1094

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. City of New York

(Emphasis added.) The emphasized language has consistently been held to grant a lien to the attorney of…

Melnick v. Kukla

This does not constitute an assignment to the plaintiff, either legal or equitable, of any part of this…