From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holly v. Gibbons

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1904
69 N.E. 731 (N.Y. 1904)

Opinion

Submitted February 8, 1904

Decided February 16, 1904


Motion to amend remittitur by inserting a provision for restitution. The effect of our reversal of the judgment of the Supreme Court, under which the "Jay Gibbons" and the "Huyck" farms were sold to the original plaintiff in this action, who was the present plaintiff's testator, was to entitle the appellant to a restitution of the property lost by the erroneous judgment, and which the respondent still possesses. (Code Civ. Pro. § 1323.) The property was not sold to a purchaser in good faith and, therefore, the respondent is in a position to respond to our order.

That a new trial has been ordered does not affect the right to a restoration of the property. ( Murray v. Berdell, 98 N.Y. 480. ) A reconveyance is not necessary, it only requires that the respondent shall be directed to restore to the appellant executor the property; in order that if, upon a new trial, the plaintiff in the action recover a judgment directing a sale of the property under the power of sale in the will of the defendant's testator he may execute it conformably to law. Such restoration should be accompanied by an accounting with respect to the rents and profits, after proper deductions for taxes and ordinary repairs. ( Murray v. Berdell, supra; Wallace v. Berdell, 101 N.Y. 13.)

The motion is granted and the remittitur will be amended, so as to recite this motion and to contain a direction that Edward Gibbons, as executor, etc., of Ransom H. Gibbons, deceased, be restored to the possession of the real estate, sold under the judgment of the Supreme Court in this action and conveyed to the plaintiff's testator; that the mesne profits of the said real estate be ascertained and paid by the plaintiff herein to the said Gibbons, as executor, subject to his liability to account therefore, and that it be remitted to the Supreme Court to make such orders and to issue such process or man dates as may be necessary and appropriate to effect the restitution hereby ordered.

Ten dollars costs of the motion are awarded to the defendant Gibbons, as executor.

PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ., concur.

Motion granted.


Summaries of

Holly v. Gibbons

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1904
69 N.E. 731 (N.Y. 1904)
Case details for

Holly v. Gibbons

Case Details

Full title:SALLY MARIA HOLLY, as Executrix of GEORGE HOLLY, Deceased, Respondent, v …

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 16, 1904

Citations

69 N.E. 731 (N.Y. 1904)
69 N.E. 731

Citing Cases

Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Irr. Dist

In addition to restoration of the specific property, the judgment debtor may be allowed to recover…

Jacobs v. Andolina

Since a court may not require payment to the receiver of any sum either for rent or for use and occupation…