From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holloway v. Ohio

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 29, 1999
197 F.3d 236 (6th Cir. 1999)

Opinion

No. 96-3732

July 29, 1999

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

[2] A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED, that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, September 3, 1999, and the appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, October 4, 1999.


Summaries of

Holloway v. Ohio

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 29, 1999
197 F.3d 236 (6th Cir. 1999)
Case details for

Holloway v. Ohio

Case Details

Full title:SAMMYE R. HOLLOWAY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF OHIO, ET AL.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jul 29, 1999

Citations

197 F.3d 236 (6th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

Holloway v. Brush

The full court then granted a rehearing en banc to decide the question of the extent to which a public child…