From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollis v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 13, 1951
63 S.E.2d 373 (Ga. 1951)

Opinion

17338.

FEBRUARY 13, 1951.

Robbery by force. Before Judge D. S. Atkinson. Chatham Superior Court. October 7, 1950.

Edward J. Goodwin, for plaintiff in error.

Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Andrew J. Ryan Jr., Solicitor-General, Sylvan A. Garfunkel, Herman W. Coolidge, Frank B. Stow and H. Grady Simmons, Assistant Attorneys-General, contra.


An indictment in two counts, the first charging robbery by force and intimidation, and the second charging robbery by "sudden snatching," was returned against Sidney Hollis. His trial resulted in a verdict of guilty on the first court, and the jury fixed his punishment at not less than four, nor more than twenty years, in the penitentiary. His motion for new trial, based on the usual general grounds, was amended by one additional ground, assigning error on the failure of the court to charge on robbery by sudden snatching. Held:

1. The defendant was positively identified by the alleged victim and one other witness for the State as the perpetrator of the crime charged, and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.

2. There being no evidence to sustain a verdict of robbery by sudden snatching, the trial judge properly excluded this charge in the indictment from consideration by the jury.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

No. 17338. FEBRUARY 13, 1951.


Summaries of

Hollis v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 13, 1951
63 S.E.2d 373 (Ga. 1951)
Case details for

Hollis v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOLLIS v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Feb 13, 1951

Citations

63 S.E.2d 373 (Ga. 1951)
63 S.E.2d 373

Citing Cases

Osborne v. State

2. "There being no evidence to sustain a verdict of robbery by sudden snatching, the trial judge properly…

McFarland v. State

The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict finding the accused guilty of robbery by force, and the…