From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollis v. Parker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2012
1:10-cv-01804 GSA PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2012)

Opinion

1:10-cv-01804 GSA PC

09-26-2012

JEREMY HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. DR. PARKER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION


(ECF No. 10)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Plaintiff has filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss this action. Plaintiff indicates that at the time this action was filed, he had not fully exhausted his available administrative remedies. Plaintiff indicates that he has now properly exhausted his claims.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff may dismiss this action on his own motion so long as a responsive pleading has not been filed. No answer has been filed, and no appearance has been entered by any defendant. Plaintiff's motion should therefore be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed, without prejudice, on Plaintiff's motion. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hollis v. Parker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2012
1:10-cv-01804 GSA PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Hollis v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. DR. PARKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

1:10-cv-01804 GSA PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2012)

Citing Cases

Maddox v. Hobbie

And the renewal being implied from the conduct of the parties, all the relations, rights, and remedies of the…