From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holley v. Brickers

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 22, 2012
466 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7372

02-22-2012

TANYIN B. HOLLEY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICARDO BRICKERS, Deputy; ANTONIO TOLBERT, Deputy, Defendants - Appellees.

Tanyin B. Holley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01205-GBL-TRJ)

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tanyin B. Holley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tanyin B. Holley, Sr. appeals the district court's order granting the Defendants' motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holley v. Brickers, No. 1:10-cv-1205-GBL-TRJ (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2011). We deny Holley's pending motion for leave to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

We note that we have considered the merits of Holley's deliberate indifference claim, but find no reversible error in the district court's adjudication of it.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Holley v. Brickers

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 22, 2012
466 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Holley v. Brickers

Case Details

Full title:TANYIN B. HOLLEY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICARDO BRICKERS, Deputy…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 22, 2012

Citations

466 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2012)