From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 3, 1936
123 Fla. 142 (Fla. 1936)

Opinion

Opinion Filed March 3, 1936.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Calhoun County, Amos Lewis, Judge.

H.V. McClellan, for Plaintiff in Error;

Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.


In this case the indictment charged manslaughter in two counts, viz.: (1) by culpable negligence in operating an automobile; (2) in operating an automobile while intoxicated. The jury found the defendant guilty on the second count. While the evidence tends strongly to sustain the charge of culpable negligence in the first count, the evidence does not prove that the defendant committed the unlawful act while intoxicated under the second count of the indictment. As the effect of the verdict is to acquit the defendant on the first count and as the evidence does not prove the charge stated in the second count of the indictment, the judgment should be and is reversed for a new trial on the second count of the indictment.

It is so ordered.

WHITFIELD, C.J., and TERRELL, BUFORD, and DAVIS, J.J., concur.

ELLIS, P.J., and BROWN, J., dissent.


Summaries of

Holland v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 3, 1936
123 Fla. 142 (Fla. 1936)
Case details for

Holland v. State

Case Details

Full title:LUKE HOLLAND v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 3, 1936

Citations

123 Fla. 142 (Fla. 1936)
166 So. 468

Citing Cases

Cutshall v. State

These are separate offenses for which one could be separately prosecuted and neither prosecution would bar…