From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Mar 16, 1949
337 Ill. App. 100 (Ill. App. Ct. 1949)

Opinion

Gen. No. 44,471. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed March 16, 1949 Released for publication April 11, 1949

STREET RAILWAYS, §§ 147-153sufficiency of evidence. In 34-year-old chemist's action for injuries claimed to have been received when he fell after catching his heel on a bolt or screw protruding from surface of platform in vestibule on defendant's streetcar, defended on ground that chemist had, in violation of ordinance, boarded the car while it was in motion, judgment for chemist was reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings on ground that judgment was against manifest weight of evidence on issues of proximate cause and due care.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County the Hon. PETER H. SCHWADA, Judge, presiding.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions. Heard in the third division, first district, this court at the June term, 1948.

Werner W. Schroeder, William S. Allen, Harry I. Parsons and Arthur J. Donovan, for appellant;

John A. Zvetina and Henry Pollenz, for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed March 16, 1949; released for publication April 11, 1949.


Summaries of

Holland v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Mar 16, 1949
337 Ill. App. 100 (Ill. App. Ct. 1949)
Case details for

Holland v. Chicago Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:William A. Holland, Appellee, v. Chicago Transit Authority, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Mar 16, 1949

Citations

337 Ill. App. 100 (Ill. App. Ct. 1949)
84 N.E.2d 861

Citing Cases

Alover Distributors, Inc. v. Kroger Co.

Kroger argues that the trial court should have granted Kroger's motion for a directed verdict or its motion…