From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hohenstein v. Jim Wilson Constr. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 12, 1984
451 So. 2d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. AU-332.

June 12, 1984.

Appeal from the Deputy Commissioner.

Edward H. Hurt of Hurt Parrish, P.A., and Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe Cooley, Orlando, for appellant.

F. Bradley Hassell of Smalbein, Eubank, Johnson, Rosier Bussey, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellees.


The deputy commissioner erred in finding that she made a mistake of fact in her prior order awarding temporary total disability benefits. In order to support a modification on the ground of mistake of fact, a mistake must be shown on the part of the deputy commissioner, not on the part of the witnesses. Sauder v. Coast Cities Coaches, Inc., 156 So.2d 162 (Fla. 1963).

We affirm the order appealed, however, because there was competent substantial evidence to support the findings that Hohenstein had reached maximum medical improvement and that he was no longer entitled to receive temporary total disability benefits.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hohenstein v. Jim Wilson Constr. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 12, 1984
451 So. 2d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Hohenstein v. Jim Wilson Constr. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL P. HOHENSTEIN, APPELLANT, v. JIM WILSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 12, 1984

Citations

451 So. 2d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Westwinds Transp., Inc. v. Murphy

However, it is clear that the mistaken factual determination must be one committed by the deputy, not merely…

Metropolitan Dade County v. Barry

Modification can be based on a mistake of fact on the part of the JCC or newly discovered evidence. City of…