From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogan v. Grand Union Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 22, 1987
126 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

January 22, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Schenectady County (Graves, J.).


Plaintiffs commenced this action against defendants, Grand Union Company and City of Schenectady, for injuries allegedly sustained when plaintiff Rita Hogan fell on a sidewalk adjacent to a parking lot owned by Grand Union. The city moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it on the ground that it did not receive prior written notice of the hazardous condition as required by Schenectady City Charter § 1.7. The motion was denied and the city appealed.

Laws requiring prior written notice are in derogation of the common law and thus are strictly construed (Doremus v Incorporated Vil. of Lynbrook, 18 N.Y.2d 362, 365; Rehfuss v. City of Albany, 118 A.D.2d 987). The primary effect of notice laws is to protect municipalities from liability for defects in streets and sidewalks which are the result of nonfeasance (Barry v Niagara Frontier Tr. Sys., 35 N.Y.2d 629, 633-634; Barrett v. City of Buffalo, 96 A.D.2d 709, 710). However, if the complaint alleges that the municipality created or caused the hazardous condition, prior written notice is not required to maintain the action (Haviland v. Smith, 91 A.D.2d 764, 765; Siddon v. Fishman Co., 65 A.D.2d 832, 833, lv denied 46 N.Y.2d 714). Here, plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that the city was negligent in the construction of the sidewalk area where the injury occurred. Although questions were raised as to the extent of actual control exercised by the city over the design and construction of the sidewalk, these represent factual questions which cannot be disposed of on a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, we conclude that Supreme Court correctly denied the city's motion for summary judgment.

Order affirmed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hogan v. Grand Union Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 22, 1987
126 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Hogan v. Grand Union Company

Case Details

Full title:RITA HOGAN et al., Respondents, v. GRAND UNION COMPANY, Respondent, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 22, 1987

Citations

126 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Kiernan v. Thompson

The proposed amended complaint asserts a cause of action based on the affirmative negligence of the city in…

Akley v. Clemons

Furthermore, the need for written notice was also obviated with respect to plaintiffs' allegations of active…