From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HOEY v. COLEMAN

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 19, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-1751 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 19, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-1751.

February 19, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On December 29, 2008, the above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed on February 10, 2009 (doc. no. 5) recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed as untimely and that a certificate of appealability be denied. On February 18, 2009 (doc. no. 6), Petitioner filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's objections do not undermine the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and the Objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2009;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as untimely.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 5) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan dated February 10, 2009, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

HOEY v. COLEMAN

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 19, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-1751 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 19, 2009)
Case details for

HOEY v. COLEMAN

Case Details

Full title:CASEY LEE HOEY, Petitioner, v. BRIAN COLEMAN, Superintendent; THE ATTORNEY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 19, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-1751 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 19, 2009)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Knox v. Hines Lbr. Co.

That they are lawful in all respects is stated by such writers as Sears, Wrightington, Fletcher, Dunn and…

Southern Pacific v. United States

The case is nothing more than an action of debt, Litchfield v. Ballou, 114 U.S. 190, and a judgment at law…