From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoehling v. Universal City Studios, Inc.

U.S.
Oct 6, 1980
449 U.S. 841 (1980)

Summary

holding that scènes à faire are not copyrightable

Summary of this case from Lexmark Intern. v. Static Control Components

Opinion

No. 79-2029.

October 6, 1980.


ORDER

C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 618 F. 2d 972.


Summaries of

Hoehling v. Universal City Studios, Inc.

U.S.
Oct 6, 1980
449 U.S. 841 (1980)

holding that scènes à faire are not copyrightable

Summary of this case from Lexmark Intern. v. Static Control Components

denying protection to historical theory explaining destruction of Hindenburg dirigible

Summary of this case from CCC Information Services, Inc. v. Maclean Hunter Market Reports, Inc.

affirming the summary judgment in a copyright infringement case concerning two versions of the story of the destruction of the dirigible "The Hindenburg" a matter of historical fact

Summary of this case from Gero v. Seven-Up Co.

stating one has no reasonable expectation of privacy in a common apartment building hallway

Summary of this case from Cornelius v. State
Case details for

Hoehling v. Universal City Studios, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HOEHLING v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, Inc., et al

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 6, 1980

Citations

449 U.S. 841 (1980)

Citing Cases

New Era Pub. Intern. v. Henry Holt

Factual information derived from a copyrighted work may be freely republished without infringement. See…

Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises

See 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 1.10[B][2], at 1-72 (1983). Courts have accordingly held that neither news…