From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hobbs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 10, 1962
352 S.W.2d 836 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)

Opinion

No. 34080.

January 10, 1962.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3, Harris County, Miron A. Love, J.

Frank Briscoe, Dist. Atty., Samuel H. Robertson, Jr., Wells Stewart, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The offense is felony theft; the punishment, enhanced under Article 63, Vernon's Ann.P.C., by three prior convictions for felonies less than capital, life imprisonment.

The State has confessed error in this case. We agree that the cause must be reversed.

In the absence of any evidence to support the allegation that each succeeding offense was committed after the judgment of conviction had become final in each prior conviction alleged for enhancement, the evidence is insufficient to sustain this conviction. Rogers v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 333 S.W.2d 383; Guilliams v. State, 159 Tex.Crim. R., 261 S.W.2d 598; also see (first Rogers case) Rogers v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 325 S.W.2d 697.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.


Summaries of

Hobbs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 10, 1962
352 S.W.2d 836 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)
Case details for

Hobbs v. State

Case Details

Full title:Vernice G. HOBBS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 10, 1962

Citations

352 S.W.2d 836 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)
171 Tex. Crim. 607

Citing Cases

Wheat v. State

It is well established law that Article 63, V.A.P.C., is reformatory in nature, and the second conviction…

NEES v. CULBERTSON

Moreover, the opinion even implies that Nees is protected from a conviction on any evidence of…