holding that concerted activities among co-defendants in jointly negotiating Master Settlement Agreement with 46 states and 6 other jurisdictions was protected activity
Summary of this case from In re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust LitigationNo. 99-5113.
February 17, 2000.
Appeal from N.D.Okla., 46 F.Supp.2d 1201.
Decision without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
holding that concerted activities among co-defendants in jointly negotiating Master Settlement Agreement with 46 states and 6 other jurisdictions was protected activity
Summary of this case from In re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litigationholding that summary judgment for the defendants was proper where a prisoner had to wait approximately twenty-four hours before his broken wrist was set
Summary of this case from Prasko v. Board of County Commissionersaffirming denial of qualified immunity to prison officials who moved an inmate into the same cell as the plaintiff while investigating whether the inmate had brutally raped another inmate at the facility
Summary of this case from Janny v. Harfordaffirming denial of qualified immunity to prison officials who moved an inmate into the same cell as the plaintiff while investigating whether the inmate had brutally raped another inmate at the facility
Summary of this case from Roemer v. Shoagaaffirming district court's refusal to consider third-party characterization of a witness' testimony on summary judgment because "a third party's description of a witness' supposed testimony is not suitable grist for the summary judgment mill."
Summary of this case from Smith v. Bibb Cnty. Sch. Dist.Full title:Hise v. Philip Morris Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Feb 17, 2000
. The Court concludes that United States v. Lopez-Carillo, United States v. Sanchez, 720 Fed.Appx. 964 (10th…
United States v. Devargas. The Court concludes that United States v. Ceballos, United States v. King, 209 Fed.Appx. 760 (10th Cir.…