From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hirsch v. Greenridge Associates, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 2006
26 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-01497.

February 21, 2006.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated January 6, 2005, as denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ginsberg Broome, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Robert M. Ginsberg of counsel), for appellant.

Smith Laquercia, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Robert Napoles of counsel), for defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker, LLP, New York, N.Y. (John Doody and Debra A. Adler of counsel), for third-party defendant.

Before: Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Lifson and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff moved, inter alia, for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1). In his affidavit submitted in support of the motion, the plaintiff alleged that the ladder he was using slipped from under him, causing him to fall and sustain serious injuries. He further alleged that the surface available for placing the ladder was "dirty, rocky and somewhat uneven." The Supreme Court denied that branch of the motion, finding that, as no depositions had yet been held, it would be premature to grant summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) at this stage of the proceedings. We agree.

Where, as here, the movant is the sole witness to the accident, "the denial of summary judgment is appropriate . . . as the salient facts are exclusively within [the movant's] knowledge and his credibility is placed in issue" ( Donohue v. Elite Assoc., 159 AD2d 605, 606; see Yellitz v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 242 AD2d 270, 271; Antunes v. 950 Park Ave. Corp., 149 AD2d 332, 333; Parsolano v. County of Nassau, 93 AD2d 815, 817; cf. Klein v. City of New York, 89 NY2d 833, 834; Miller v. Long Is. Light. Co., 166 AD2d 564, 565). Therefore, the court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1).


Summaries of

Hirsch v. Greenridge Associates, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 2006
26 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Hirsch v. Greenridge Associates, LLC

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR HIRSCH, Appellant, v. GREENRIDGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 2006

Citations

26 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1279
809 N.Y.S.2d 557

Citing Cases

Vazquez v. Global Toche Chauffeured Serv. LLC

While it is generally true that, where the movant is the sole witness to the accident, the denial of summary…

Sha-Sha Clark v. City of New York

Specifically, it is unclear whether he filled a hole in plaintiffs bathroom ceiling and then painted, or if…