From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HIO v. YOUNGLOVE CASKET COMPANY, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

March, 1923.


The only question raised is whether or not after the claim had been denied by the referee, the State Industrial Board could open the case and grant further hearing. The referee decided, as a matter of fact, that there was not sufficient notice given in this case of the accident to excuse a written notice. Section 19 of the Labor Law provides: "The decision of a referee on such a claim shall be deemed the decision of the Industrial Board from the date of the filing thereof in the Department, unless the Industrial Board, on its own motion or on application duly made to it, modify or rescind such decision." Upon application the Board did rescind the decision, and made the award from which the appeal is taken. The award should, therefore, be affirmed. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs in favor of the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

HIO v. YOUNGLOVE CASKET COMPANY, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

HIO v. YOUNGLOVE CASKET COMPANY, INC

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. WILLIAM D. HIO, Claimant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1923

Citations

206 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Citing Cases

Matter of Levine v. Comet Painting Dec. Co.

There is authority in these sections and rules to take new evidence after the referee has made his decision…