From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hills v. Hills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1992
182 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 28, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.).


After considering the factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6), the court set temporary support in the amount of $480 a week and ordered defendant to pay directly to his parents $500 a month for the mortgage on the marital residence in Texas. Guided by the fact that defendant had voluntarily paid plaintiff $2000 a month for approximately ten years, the award of temporary support was appropriately made with a view towards maintaining the status quo pending the divorce action. In any case, the claimed inequities in pendente lite relief are to be remedied by a speedy trial (Bremer v Miele, 155 A.D.2d 359). Furthermore, giving due consideration to the parties' disparate financial circumstances, the court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff an award of attorney's fee in an amount one-tenth of the fee requested (DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 N.Y.2d 879; Koerner v Koerner, 170 A.D.2d 297, 298).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Hills v. Hills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1992
182 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Hills v. Hills

Case Details

Full title:MYRNA G. HILLS, Respondent, v. ALAN J. HILLS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 436

Citing Cases

Zaharopoulos v. Zaharopoulos

The husband has not demonstrated that the pendente lite support awards complained of have left him unable to…

T.H. v. G.M.

The Defendant seeks temporary maintenance from the Plaintiff. An award of support pendente lite is designed…