reporting trial court's finding that defendant's frequent reference to plaintiff's sex discrimination action against prior employer warranted inference that defendant's refusal to hire was retaliatory
Summary of this case from McMenemy v. City of RochesterNo. 91-424.
December 16, 1991.
C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 930 F. 2d 1516.
reporting trial court's finding that defendant's frequent reference to plaintiff's sex discrimination action against prior employer warranted inference that defendant's refusal to hire was retaliatory
Summary of this case from McMenemy v. City of Rochesterstating "[t]he plaintiff need not show the specific action at issue has been previously held unlawful, he need only show that the alleged unlawfulness was apparent in light of preexisting law"
Summary of this case from Henkle v. Gregoryexamining whether speaker was "on a mission to protect the public" despite inherent public interest in criticisms aimed at quality of physician training program
Summary of this case from Daley v. Aetna Life Casualty Co.Full title:HILLIARD v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 16, 1991
Id., ¶ 33. It is well settled that complaints regarding a personal employment situation are not…
Shub v. HankinOur Court of Appeals has not addressed the issue of whether temporary suspension of a tenured professor's…