From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 23, 1956
238 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1956)

Opinion

No. 12852.

October 23, 1956.

Howard T. Cook, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

John C. Crawford, Jr., and James M. Meek, Knoxville, Tenn., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and STEWART, Circuit Judges.


The appellant was convicted and sentenced in the Eastern District of Tennessee for knowingly transporting in interstate commerce a stolen motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312 and for transporting in interstate commerce a person who had been kidnapped and held for ransom in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1201. No appeal was taken from this conviction. He now comes before this court on appeal from an order denying his motion to vacate sentence filed in the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. His appeal from the denial of a prior motion filed under that section was before us in Hill v. United States, 6 Cir., 1955, 223 F.2d 699, certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 867, 76 S. Ct. 113, where it was held that the district court's finding that the appellant had the mental capacity to stand trial was not, in the light of the record of the district court's hearing on that issue, open to collateral attack upon a motion to set aside the sentence. Nothing not already considered and disposed of by this court is presented by this appeal.

The order of the district court is accordingly affirmed.


Summaries of

Hill v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 23, 1956
238 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1956)
Case details for

Hill v. United States

Case Details

Full title:James Francis HILL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 23, 1956

Citations

238 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1956)

Citing Cases

Hill v. United States

The initial petition, filed upon October 18, 1954, was dismissed by the District Judge and this action…

United States v. Hill

After review of the files and record in this case and prior motions of the appellant, the District Court…