From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Streeval

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 22, 2021
No. 20-7637 (4th Cir. Jul. 22, 2021)

Opinion

20-7637

07-22-2021

NATHAN L. HILL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN STREEVAL, Respondent - Appellee.

Nathan L. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: July 20, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:20-cv-00309-EKD-JCH)

Nathan L. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathan L. Hill, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Streeval, No. 7:20-cv-00309-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va. June 9, 2020; Oct. 19, 2020). We deny Hill's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hill v. Streeval

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 22, 2021
No. 20-7637 (4th Cir. Jul. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Hill v. Streeval

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN L. HILL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN STREEVAL, Respondent …

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 22, 2021

Citations

No. 20-7637 (4th Cir. Jul. 22, 2021)