From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 22, 2000
754 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D99-4128.

Opinion filed March 22, 2000.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Donald C. Evans, Judge.


Gregory I. Hill appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct sentence to reflect additional jail credit, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm based on Hill's failure to comply with the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Hill's ability, if any, to raise this issue in a properly pleaded rule 3.800(a) motion or a timely, properly sworn motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. If Hill files either type of motion, he must demonstrate that the time he spent at DACCO was the functional equivalent of being in jail and overcome the hurdles posed by the supreme court's holding inTal-Mason v. State, 515 So.2d 738 (Fla. 1987).

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 22, 2000
754 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Hill v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY I. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 22, 2000

Citations

754 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Toney v. State

Daniel A. Toney challenges the order of the trial court denying his motion for jail credit that was filed…

Williams v. State

See Pennington v. State, 398 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1981). In so holding we do not overlook Hill v. State, 754 So.2d…