From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 19, 1935
159 So. 503 (Ala. Crim. App. 1935)

Opinion

8 Div. 932.

February 19, 1935.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lauderdale County; J. Fred Johnson, Jr., Judge.

Tom Hill was convicted of an offense, and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Raymond Murphy, of Florence, for appellant.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.


It appears from the record that this is a companion case of that of Will Allen v. State, 159 So. 503. The facts and circumstances attending the two trials were identical and grew out of the same transaction. Upon authority of that case, supra, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is reversed and the cause remanded.

Ante, p. 347.

In addition to what was said by this court in the Allen Case, supra, it might be proper to add that error prevailed in the rulings of the court on the cross-examination of the state witnesses, which rulings tended to unduly abridge the right of this appellant to fully cross-examine the state's witnesses as to the facts pertaining or relating to the res gestæ of the offense complained of. It is elementary that all which was said or done at the time by parties present was relevant and admissible.

For the errors indicated, this cause is reversed and remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 19, 1935
159 So. 503 (Ala. Crim. App. 1935)
Case details for

Hill v. State

Case Details

Full title:HILL v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 19, 1935

Citations

159 So. 503 (Ala. Crim. App. 1935)
26 Ala. App. 347

Citing Cases

Packer v. State

Sherrer v. State, 16 Ala. App. 190, 76 So. 474. In Hill v. State, 26 Ala. App. 347, 159 So. 503, it was said:…

Landry v. State

Womack v. State, 34 Ala. App. 487, 41 So.2d 429. In Hill v. State, 26 Ala. App. 347, 159 So. 503, we find…