From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Neill

U.S.
Jan 9, 2006
546 U.S. 1101 (2006)

Summary

In Neill v. Hill, supra, it was also held: `The testimony of witnesses who swear positively, and are not otherwise impeached or discredited, should not be discarded merely because they are related to the party in whose behalf they testify, although it is proper for the jury to consider such relationship when there is other matter by reason of which they may legitimately question the credibility of the testimony.

Summary of this case from Georgia Highway Express Inc. v. Sturkie

Opinion

No. 05-7096.

January 9, 2006.


Certiorari Denied. (See also No. 05-415, Supra.)

C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 634.


Summaries of

Hill v. Neill

U.S.
Jan 9, 2006
546 U.S. 1101 (2006)

In Neill v. Hill, supra, it was also held: `The testimony of witnesses who swear positively, and are not otherwise impeached or discredited, should not be discarded merely because they are related to the party in whose behalf they testify, although it is proper for the jury to consider such relationship when there is other matter by reason of which they may legitimately question the credibility of the testimony.

Summary of this case from Georgia Highway Express Inc. v. Sturkie
Case details for

Hill v. Neill

Case Details

Full title:HILL v. NEILL ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 9, 2006

Citations

546 U.S. 1101 (2006)
126 S. Ct. 1038

Citing Cases

Sellers v. State

There is nothing here to indicate that the defendant's testimony was disregarded. And see Detwiler v. Cox,…

Carter v. State

The defendant himself admitted the language used on the sign, and we therefore do not think this case comes…