From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Lockhart

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 20, 1984
764 F.2d 1279 (8th Cir. 1984)

Summary

affirming per curiam without opinions on the merits

Summary of this case from Baker v. Pataki

Opinion

No. 83-1397.

Submitted September 10, 1984.

Decided September 20, 1984.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas; Garnett Thomas Eisele, Chief Judge.

Before LAY Chief Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and HEANEY, BRIGHT, ROSS, McMILLIAN, ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, en banc.


ORDER

This case has been considered by the court en banc. The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court.


Summaries of

Hill v. Lockhart

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 20, 1984
764 F.2d 1279 (8th Cir. 1984)

affirming per curiam without opinions on the merits

Summary of this case from Baker v. Pataki
Case details for

Hill v. Lockhart

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM LLOYD HILL, APPELLANT, v. A.L. LOCKHART, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 20, 1984

Citations

764 F.2d 1279 (8th Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

Hill v. Lockhart

This Court granted Hill's petition for rehearing en banc, thereby vacating the three-judge panel's decision.…

Baker v. Pataki

But see Ohio ex rel. Eaton v. Price, 364 U.S. 263, 263 (1960) (opinion of Brennan, J). The practice in other…