From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Cockrell

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 14, 1977
141 Ga. App. 39 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

53309.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 7, 1977.

DECIDED JANUARY 14, 1977.

Action on contract. DeKalb State Court. Before Judge Smith.

Wendell C. Lindsey, for appellant.

Dock H. Davis, for appellee.


"[W]here the trial judge, sitting as the trior of the facts, hears the evidence, his findings based upon conflicting evidence is analogous to the verdict of a jury and should not be disturbed by a reviewing court if there is any evidence to support it." West v. West, 228 Ga. 397, 398 ( 185 S.E.2d 763) (1971); Lester Colodny Const. Co. v. Allen, 129 Ga. App. 545 ( 199 S.E.2d 917) (1973). Here there was ample legal evidence to support the findings of fact, and there is no error in the trial judge's conclusions of law. Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

For prior appearance see Hill v. Cockrell, 139 Ga. App. 616 ( 229 S.E.2d 105) (1976).


SUBMITTED JANUARY 7, 1977 — DECIDED JANUARY 14, 1977.


Summaries of

Hill v. Cockrell

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 14, 1977
141 Ga. App. 39 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Hill v. Cockrell

Case Details

Full title:HILL v. COCKRELL

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 14, 1977

Citations

141 Ga. App. 39 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
232 S.E.2d 384

Citing Cases

Roan v. Cranston

Applying the "any evidence" standard of review, we will not disturb the trial court's conclusions that the…

Levy v. Aiken

There was no gross abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in making its findings of fact and…