From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank

The Supreme Court of Washington
Feb 25, 1925
233 P. 669 (Wash. 1925)

Opinion

No. 18365. En Banc.

February 25, 1925.

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered August 6, 1923, upon findings favorable to the plaintiff, in an action for money received, tried to the court. Reversed on plaintiff's appeal; affirmed on defendant's appeal.

James R. Chambers, for plaintiff.

Almon Ray Smith and Herr, Bayley Croson, for defendant.


ON REHEARING.


The evidence in this case does not bring it within the rule of the case of Hill Syrup Co. v. Frederick Nelson, ante p. 155, 233 P. 663. Each case must be determined upon its own record and the facts therein must be supported by the evidence in that particular case. In this case there is no evidence from which it can be found that the Hill Syrup Company was negligent in permitting the practice of Sander in paying his individual debts with corporate funds to begin and continue. It follows, therefore, that the Departmental opinion, Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank of Seattle, 129 Wn. 171, 224 P. 578, must be adhered to.

TOLMAN, C.J., MITCHELL, PARKER, BRIDGES, ASKREN, MACKINTOSH, and HOLCOMB, JJ., concur.

FULLERTON, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank

The Supreme Court of Washington
Feb 25, 1925
233 P. 669 (Wash. 1925)
Case details for

Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank

Case Details

Full title:HILL SYRUP COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF…

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington

Date published: Feb 25, 1925

Citations

233 P. 669 (Wash. 1925)
233 P. 669
133 Wash. 696

Citing Cases

Scottsbluff Nat. Bank v. Blue J Feeds, Inc.

See, also, 31 C. J. S., Estoppel, 103, p. 325; 21 C. J., Estoppel, 176, p. 1170; Apostoloff v. Levy, 174 N.Y.…

Hill Syrup Co. v. Frederick Nelson

Appellant was the plaintiff below and appeals from a judgment denying it recovery. The general history of the…