From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hilborn v. Prime Time Club, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 12, 2012
No. 4:11CV00197 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 12, 2012)

Summary

finding exotic dancers were not employees under the FLSA

Summary of this case from Cruthis v. Vision's

Opinion

No. 4:11CV00197 BSM

07-12-2012

CRYSTAL HILBORN, et al., Each Individually and on behalf of Others Similarly Situated PLAINTIFFS v. PRIME TIME CLUB, INC., Individually and d/b/a PRIME TIME DEFENDANT


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the order entered today, this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

__________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hilborn v. Prime Time Club, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 12, 2012
No. 4:11CV00197 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 12, 2012)

finding exotic dancers were not employees under the FLSA

Summary of this case from Cruthis v. Vision's
Case details for

Hilborn v. Prime Time Club, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CRYSTAL HILBORN, et al., Each Individually and on behalf of Others…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 12, 2012

Citations

No. 4:11CV00197 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 12, 2012)

Citing Cases

Verma v. 3001 Castor, Inc.

Hart v. Rick's Cabaret Int'l, Inc., 967 F.Supp.2d 901, 912-13 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (citing Harrell v. Diamond A…

Shaw v. Set Enters., Inc.

In their Motion, Defendants point to only two unpublished cases wherein district courts in other circuits…