From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hihn v. Spreckels

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1881
59 Cal. 315 (Cal. 1881)

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, in the Twentieth District Court, County of Santa Cruz. Belden, J.

         A petition for hearing in bank was filed in this case after judgment, and denied.

         COUNSEL

          Charles B. Younger, for Appellant.

          Andrew Craig, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         The Court:

         Appeal from the judgment on the judgment roll. The findings show that the road in question crosses the Aptos rancho, owned by the defendant; that the road was used by the plaintiff, by the license of defendant and his grantor, Castro, which license was revocable by the owner of the land over which the road passed; and that the defendant closed the road and revoked the license. Judgment rightly followed for defendant.

         Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Hihn v. Spreckels

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1881
59 Cal. 315 (Cal. 1881)
Case details for

Hihn v. Spreckels

Case Details

Full title:F. A. HIHN v. CLAUS SPRECKELS

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1881

Citations

59 Cal. 315 (Cal. 1881)

Citing Cases

Miller v. Desilu Productions, Inc.

[7] Revocation may be made by implication from the acts and conduct of the licensor. ( Hihn v. Spreckels, 59…

Flickinger v. Shaw

(Goddard on Easements, 472-475; Morse v. Copeland, 2 Gray, 302.) The only interest which Flickinger ever had…