From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hignett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 21, 1959
168 Tex. Crim. 380 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)

Opinion

No. 30915.

October 21, 1959.

Appeal from the 42nd Judicial District Court, Taylor County, J. R. Black, J.

Leland D. Sutton, Abilene, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The offense is assault with intent to murder; the punishment, 10 years.

Our able State's Attorney confesses error, and we agree. The state, in the presence of the jury, called the appellant's wife as a witness against him, thereby forcing the appellant to object to her testimony on the grounds that she was his wife. Later in the trial, the State propounded further questions to other witnesses as to what the appellant's wife had told them concerning the assault and again forced the appellant to object.

Recently, in Caldwell v. State, 162 Tex.Crim. R., 287 S.W.2d 176, we had occasion to reverse a conviction for the same error here presented, and there referred to Judge Martin's statement of the rule and the reason supporting it in his able opinion in Lynn v. State, 113 Tex.Crim. R., 21 S.W.2d 1042.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.


Summaries of

Hignett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 21, 1959
168 Tex. Crim. 380 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
Case details for

Hignett v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Leroy HIGNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 21, 1959

Citations

168 Tex. Crim. 380 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
168 Tex. Crim. 380

Citing Cases

Thrash v. State

In Story v. State, 107 Tex.Cr.R. 293, 296 S.W. 516, it was held reversible error for a witness to testify…

San Fratello v. United States

The prosecution could have had no purpose in calling this witness and requiring her to claim her privilege in…