From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Highqbpo, LLC v. U.S.

U.S. Court of Federal Claims
Dec 16, 2010
No. 08-70 C (Fed. Cl. Dec. 16, 2010)

Opinion

No. 08-70 C.

December 16, 2010

David T. Hickey, McLean, VA, for plaintiff.

Michael N. O'Connell, J., United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant.


Substitution of Chapter 11 Plan Trustee as Plaintiff under Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims


OPINION AND ORDER

Before the court is Robert Sandoval, Plan Trustee's Motion to Substitute Robert Sandoval, Plan Trustee as Plaintiff Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Motion). Substitution of parties is governed by Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. In his Motion, Robert Sandoval states that he is the appointed Chapter 11 Plan Trustee in the bankruptcy case In re HighQ BPO, LLC, f/k/a International Outsourcing Services, LLC, Case No. 09-30511-LMC (Bankr. E.D. Tex.) (the HighQ Bankruptcy). Motion 2. Pursuant to the Settlement Order in the HighQ Bankruptcy, the Plan Trustee is authorized to seek dismissal of this case. Motion 3. Based on the representations contained in the Motion and because the substitution of a trustee in bankruptcy for a bankruptcy plaintiff has been found to be within the discretion of the trial court in similar circumstances, see Bauer v. Commerce Union Bank, Clarksville, Tennessee, 859 F.2d 438, 441-42 (6th Cir. 1988) (interpreting Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), the Motion is GRANTED.

The Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) generally mirror the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP).Champagne v. United States, 35 Fed. Cl. 198, 205 n. 5 (1996) ("In general, the rules of this court are closely patterned on the [FRCP]. Therefore, precedent under the [FRCP] is relevant to interpreting the rules of this court . . ."); see also C. Sanchez Son, Inc. v. United States, 6 F.3d 1539, 1541 n. 2 (Fed. Cir. 1993) ("The [RCFC] generally follow the [FRCP]."). Therefore, the court relies on cases interpreting FRCP 25 as well as those interpreting RCFC 25.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Highqbpo, LLC v. U.S.

U.S. Court of Federal Claims
Dec 16, 2010
No. 08-70 C (Fed. Cl. Dec. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Highqbpo, LLC v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:HIGHQBPO, LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant

Court:U.S. Court of Federal Claims

Date published: Dec 16, 2010

Citations

No. 08-70 C (Fed. Cl. Dec. 16, 2010)