From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Higgins v. Linstra

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 14, 1929
147 A. 909 (N.J. 1929)

Opinion

Decided October 14th, 1929.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Messrs. J.W. E.A. De Yoe, for the appellants.

Messrs. Feder Rinzler, for the respondents.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 104 N.J. Eq. 355. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Higgins v. Linstra

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 14, 1929
147 A. 909 (N.J. 1929)
Case details for

Higgins v. Linstra

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT HIGGINS, JR., et al., appellants, v. RICHARD LINSTRA et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 14, 1929

Citations

147 A. 909 (N.J. 1929)
147 A. 909

Citing Cases

Laytham v. Mann

But the conflict engendered by this denial alone will not of itself suffice to bar the reformation which…

Ehnes v. Monroe Loan Society

To support reformation, a high order of proof is required. It must be "clear, cogent and convincing" or…