From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Feeney

U.S.
Jan 9, 1989
488 U.S. 1005 (1989)

Summary

holding that the warrant which authorized a search for "any and all records . . . and automobile auction company records" was not overbroad even though it used generic terms because the inspector could not have known at the time he applied for the warrant which precise records and files would contain information concerning the odometer tampering scheme

Summary of this case from State v. Nuckolls

Opinion

No. 88-624.

January 9, 1989.


ORDER

C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 850 F. 2d 152.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Feeney

U.S.
Jan 9, 1989
488 U.S. 1005 (1989)

holding that the warrant which authorized a search for "any and all records . . . and automobile auction company records" was not overbroad even though it used generic terms because the inspector could not have known at the time he applied for the warrant which precise records and files would contain information concerning the odometer tampering scheme

Summary of this case from State v. Nuckolls

In Trinidad and Tobago, the court states that the discoverability requirement exists and in support cites John Deere, 754 F.2d at 136, and a district court case, In re Court of the Comm'r of Patents for South Africa, 88 F.R.D. 75, 77 (E.D.Pa. 1980).

Summary of this case from Application of Gianoli

identifying Supreme Court's explicit awareness of risk

Summary of this case from Town of Andover v. State Financial Serv
Case details for

Hicks v. Feeney

Case Details

Full title:HICKS v. FEENEY, DIRECTOR, DELAWARE STATE HOSPITAL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 9, 1989

Citations

488 U.S. 1005 (1989)

Citing Cases

In re Asta Medica, S.A.

See John Deere Ltd. v. Sperry Corp., 754 F.2d 132, 136 (3rd Cir. 1985) ("To require that a district court…

Jeffreys v. Griffin

Four years after Ryan, the Court of Appeals decided three other cases applying the doctrine of collateral…