Opinion
1:22-cv-8257-GHW
03-14-2023
CONROY HIBBERT, JR., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
GREGORY H. WOODS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
As discussed at the March 14, 2023 conference, this Court will proceed by considering Plaintiff's original and amended complaints together, which it may do given his pro se status. See Herbin v. Blake, No. 14-cv-3636, 2015 WL 260581, at *1 n.1 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2015). Additionally, the Court notes that Corporation Counsel has stipulated that the City of New York has been served in this action.
Corporation Counsel is hereby ORDERED to submit a letter to the Court by no later than March 21, 2023 with a proposal of how to proceed as to service of Defendant Warden Sherma Dunbar.
Additionally, the United States Marshal Service is hereby ORDERED to serve named Defendant Patricia Feeney with a copy of (a) summons, (b) Plaintiff's original complaint, Dkt. No. 2, and (c) Plaintiff's amended complaint, Dkt. No. 19. Defendant Feeney should be served at the following address:
Patricia Feeney 75-20 Astoria Blvd., Ste. 305 E. Elmhurst, N.Y. 11
The Court will enter the case management plan in this case by separate order. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order and the case management plan to Plaintiff.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).
SO ORDERED.