From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herzfeld Stern v. Freidus

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 20, 1971
69 Misc. 2d 578 (N.Y. App. Term 1971)

Summary

holding stock dividend payable to actual owner, not owner of record

Summary of this case from Torres v. $36,256.80 U.S. Currency

Opinion

December 20, 1971

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York, PHILIP J. ZICHELLO, J.

Baer Marks ( Gerald Maltz of counsel), for appellant.

Harry Grossman and Richard Kaye for respondent.


Upon motion for summary judgment, plaintiff broker established that it purchased certain listed securities from defendant, through his brokerage firm, prior to the date a dividend was declared thereon. Defendant failed to raise any legal or relevant factual issue in defense of the conversion action, based upon his wrongful retention of the dividend, which would preclude summary judgment, on this issue of liability.

The fact that defendant remained the owner of record on the books of the corporation on the dividend payable date does not affect the actual owner's title to the dividend (see Lunt v. Genesee Val. Trust Co., 162 Misc. 859, and cases cited therein at pp. 860-861). The further fact that plaintiff purchased the stock for its own customer does not affect its standing to sue. Plaintiff acted as principal and registered the stock in its own name (see Ludwig v. Gillespie, 105 N.Y. 653). Finally, the claim of laches is unavailable in this action at law (see Feldman v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 259 App. Div. 123). While the complaint also asserts a claim of unjust enrichment, the evidence establishes that the gravamen of the entire action is a claim of conversion, timely commenced. On the question of damages, plaintiff is entitled to an amendment of the complaint to increase the ad damnum, but it must prove, upon an assessment, its unsubstantiated claim that defendant sold the dividend stock at a higher market price than that obtained on the dividend payable date.

The orders should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted increasing the ad damnum, awarding plaintiff summary judgment on the issue of liability, and directing an assessment of damages.

GOLD and STREIT, JJ., concur; MARKOWITZ, J., taking no part.

Orders reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Herzfeld Stern v. Freidus

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 20, 1971
69 Misc. 2d 578 (N.Y. App. Term 1971)

holding stock dividend payable to actual owner, not owner of record

Summary of this case from Torres v. $36,256.80 U.S. Currency
Case details for

Herzfeld Stern v. Freidus

Case Details

Full title:HERZFELD STERN, Appellant, v. JACOB FREIDUS, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1971

Citations

69 Misc. 2d 578 (N.Y. App. Term 1971)
330 N.Y.S.2d 479

Citing Cases

Torres v. $36,256.80 U.S. Currency

Id. at 715. See also Herzfeld Stern v. Freidus, 69 Misc.2d 578, 330 N.Y.S.2d 479 (1st Dep't 1971) (holding…