From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 6, 1960
280 F.2d 888 (9th Cir. 1960)

Opinion

No. 16463.

July 25, 1960. Rehearing Denied September 6, 1960.

Roy C. Hall, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Laurence E. Dayton, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., John H. Riordan, John Kaplan, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.


Appellant (Jesus Sanches Herrera, also known as Jesse Herrera) and Wong Shew Moo, also known as Tommy Wong, were indicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division. The indictment was in three counts. Counts 1 and 2 charged violations of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174 by appellant and Wong Shew Moo. Count 3 charged a violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174 by appellant.

Appellant was arraigned, pleaded not guilty, had a jury trial and was found guilty on each count of the indictment. A judgment of conviction was entered, sentencing appellant to be imprisoned five years on each count, the sentences on counts 1 and 2 to run consecutively, the sentences on counts 1 and 3 to run concurrently. This appeal is from that judgment.

Appellant's brief does not, as required by our Rule 18, 28 U.S.C.A., contain a specification of errors relied upon. Hence this appeal presents nothing for review. Though not required to do so, we have searched the record for error and have found none.

Lemke v. United States, 9 Cir., 211 F.2d 73, 14 Alaska 587; Pinkston v. United States, 9 Cir., 278 F.2d 833.

See cases cited in footnote 1.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Herrera v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 6, 1960
280 F.2d 888 (9th Cir. 1960)
Case details for

Herrera v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Jesus Sanches HERRERA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 6, 1960

Citations

280 F.2d 888 (9th Cir. 1960)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Rewald

Rewald's failure to comply with these rudimentary procedural obligations has made our task significantly more…

United States v. Haldeman

Compare Minnesota Mining and Mfg. Co. v. Technical Tape Corp., 309 F.2d 55, 59 (7th Cir. 1962), cert. denied,…