From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 30, 1998
710 So. 2d 1392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-1535

Opinion filed June 30, 1998. JANUARY TERM, A.D. 1998

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Leslie B. Rothenberg, Judge. L.T. No. 97-1328.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Louis Campbell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Wendy Benner-Leon and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorneys General and Odia Mallard, Certified Legal Intern; Katherine Fernandez Rundle, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY, J., and DAUKSCH, Associate Judge.


The appellant was found guilty of direct criminal contempt for violating an oral court order concerning the contents of his testimony when he took the stand as a defendant in an earlier criminal trial. Our review of the record reveals both that the oral order did not contain the requisite specificity, see Kranis v. Kranis, 313 So.2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), and that there was insufficient indication of Herrera's intent to violate the order. See Dudley v. State, 511 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Accordingly, the adjudication and sentence are reversed and the defendant is ordered discharged.

Rehearing is dispensed with. This decision shall take effect immediately.


Summaries of

Herrera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 30, 1998
710 So. 2d 1392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Herrera v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARCO TULIO HERRERA, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 30, 1998

Citations

710 So. 2d 1392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

Nevertheless, we find that, prior to finding that trial counsel has committed a crime by virtue of his…