From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Vallco Int'l Shopping Ctr., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 24, 2012
Case No.: 5:10-CV-02848-EJD (N.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 5:10-CV-02848-EJD

04-24-2012

ALMA CLARISA HERNANDEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VALLCO INTERNATIONAL SHOPPING CENTER, LLC, et al., Defendants.

MOORE LAW FIRM, PC. Tanya E. Moore, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Alma Clarisa Hernandez, Ronald Moore and Theresa Wallen Evelyn L. Deaton, Attorney for Defendant TGI Friday's, Inc.


K. Randolph Moore, Esq. SBN 106933

Tanya E. Moore, Esq. SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Alma Clarisa Hernandez,

Ronald Moore, and

Theresa Wallen

JOINT REQUEST BY PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT TGI FRIDAY'S, INC. TO CONTINUE FURTHER CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DATE SET FOR AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS; [PROPOSED] ORDER


Assigned to Honorable Edward J. Davila

Plaintiffs Alma Clarisa Hernandez, Theresa Wallen and Ronald Moore ("Plaintiffs"), together with Defendant TGI Friday's, Inc. ("TGI Friday's") hereby respectfully request that the Court again continue the Further Case Management Conference currently set for May 4, 2012, and the deadline of May 4, 2012 for amendment of pleadings, for the following reasons:

1. This matter was brought by Plaintiffs under the Americans with Disabilities Act Title III ("ADA") to have alleged barriers to their access removed from defendants' facilities located at the Vallco Shopping Mall in Cupertino, California. Accordingly, this Court's General Order 56 ("GO 56") has governed the procedural course of this matter to date. The mediation as to all defendants except defendant TGI Friday's took place on March 8 and 9, 2012 which mediation resulted in settlement being reached with all participating defendants. Defendant TGI Friday's was unable to attend the mediation on March 8 and 9, 2012.

2. The remaining mediation as to TGI Friday's has been tentatively set for June 7 or June 11, 2012 pending confirmation by the mediator. During the intervening time, Plaintiffs and TGI Friday's have been actively and diligently involved in productive settlement discussions and are cautiously optimistic that a settlement will be reached.

3. Plaintiffs have now resolved this matter as to all defendants except TGI Friday's. Plaintiffs have either dismissed the settling defendants or will be doing so shortly pending finalizing the settlements.

4. The purpose of GO 56 is "to require the parties to engage in a structured process designed to achieve early compliance with the ADA while minimizing the adversarial litigation process and concomitant fees." White v. Ming R. Shen, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2174 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2011). The Further Case Management Conference will best serve the purpose of GO 56 if held after the TGI Friday's mediation in order to afford the parties an opportunity to reach an informal resolution prior to incurring the costs preparing for and attending the conference.

5. Requiring amendment of Plaintiffs' operative complaint prior to the completion of mediation will also needlessly add significant attorney fees to address allegations against TGI Friday's who may be dismissed after mediation. Plaintiffs must amend their complaint to conform to the standing requirements of Chapman v. Pier One Imports (U.S.), Inc., 631 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2011) (decided after Plaintiffs' filing of their Second Amended Complaint) and also to allege every barrier they seek to have removed from each of defendants' facilities (information obtained as a result of the joint site inspections which occurred after Plaintiffs' initial filing). Amongst other relief, Plaintiffs seek the recovery of attorney fees and costs in this matter. Therefore, minimizing the amount of such fees is beneficial to TGI Friday's as well as conserves the esorurces of the Court.

6. Accordingly, Plaintiffs and TGI Friday's hereby respectfully request that the Court continue the Further Case Management Conference to a date after June 28, 2012 to afford time for the completion of mediation, and the last date for Plaintiffs to file a motion or stipulation for leave to amend their Second Amended Complaint to June 28, 2012.

MOORE LAW FIRM, PC.

______________________

Tanya E. Moore, Attorneys for

Plaintiffs Alma Clarisa Hernandez,

Ronald Moore and Theresa Wallen

______________________

Evelyn L. Deaton, Attorney for

Defendant TGI Friday's, Inc.

ORDER

Upon request of Plaintiffs and Defendant TGI Friday's, Inc., and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Further Case Management Conference currently set for May 4, 2012 be continued to 8/10/2012 , 2012 at 10:00am in Courtroom 4. The Parties are ordered to file an updated Case Management Conference Statement one week prior to the conference.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall have to and including June 28, 2012 to file a stipulation or motion to amend their Second Amended Complaint.

This order supersedes Docket Item No. 288.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Vallco Int'l Shopping Ctr., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 24, 2012
Case No.: 5:10-CV-02848-EJD (N.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Vallco Int'l Shopping Ctr., LLC

Case Details

Full title:ALMA CLARISA HERNANDEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VALLCO INTERNATIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 24, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 5:10-CV-02848-EJD (N.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2012)