From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Melro Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1996
229 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 29, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

CPLR 5501 (c) provides that "the appellate division shall determine that an award is excessive or inadequate if it deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation". The record reveals that the plaintiff Luis Hernandez fell into an open elevator shaft sustaining severe personal injuries, including a comminuted fracture of the upper portion of the humerus and the loss of 50% of his nose. Mr. Hernandez has undergone numerous surgical procedures, with more to occur in the future, and has been confined to the hospital and to bed intermittently for substantial periods of time since the accident. Further, Mr. Hernandez has suffered from clinical depression, affecting his relationships and his ability to work. We find that the award for pain and suffering and future medical expenses did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]).

The reduced award to the plaintiff Maria Hernandez on her cause of action to recover damages for loss of services was not inadequate and did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]).

The parties' remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Melro Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1996
229 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Melro Company

Case Details

Full title:LUIS HERNANDEZ et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. MELRO COMPANY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 29, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 44

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Burack

l debridement and skin grafting resulting in permanent scarring]; Matsur v. New York City Transit Authority,…

Singh v. Gladys Towncars

To the extent indicated, the awards for past and future (over 31 years) pain and suffering materially deviate…