From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. IndyMac Bank

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jul 9, 2013
532 F. App'x 763 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-17669 D.C. No. 2:12-cv-00369-MMD-CWH

07-09-2013

JOSE E. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. INDYMAC BANK; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Miranda Du, District Judge, Presiding

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, CANBY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Jose Hernandez appeals pro se the district court's denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. IndyMac Bank

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jul 9, 2013
532 F. App'x 763 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Hernandez v. IndyMac Bank

Case Details

Full title:JOSE E. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. INDYMAC BANK; et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 9, 2013

Citations

532 F. App'x 763 (9th Cir. 2013)