Opinion
Argued November 21, 1921
Decided December 13, 1921
Vermont Hatch and Joseph M. Hartfield for plaintiffs, appellants.
Louis H. Hahlo for receiver, appellant.
Elbridge L. Adams for respondent.
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
The question certified is answered in the negative. Upon the facts appearing in this record the court at least had the power as a matter of discretion to make provision as it did for payment of the commissions and expenses of the receiver. We do not pass upon the disposition of such items under other circumstances.
HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.