From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herman v. Town of Clarence

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 31, 1998

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sconiers, J. — Summary Judgment.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Audrey J. Herman (plaintiff) when she tripped and fell over a railroad tie placed near the edge of a parking lot on property owned by defendant. Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendant failed to meet its initial burden of establishing as a matter of law that the railroad tie over which plaintiff tripped and fell was not a dangerous or defective condition or that the alleged defect was obvious and readily observable ( see generally, Kurshals v. Connetquot Cent. School Dist., 227 A.D.2d 593). Although plaintiffs will bear the burden at trial of proving that the railroad tie was a dangerous or defective condition that was not obvious and readily observable, on its motion for summary judgment defendant bore the burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see, Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853; Roska v. Town of Cheektowaga [appeal No. 2], 251 A.D.2d 984). Although there is no need to consider the adequacy of plaintiffs' submissions in opposition to the motion because defendant failed to meet its burden ( see, Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., supra, at 853), we note that, in any event, plaintiffs sustained their burden of demonstrating that a triable issue of fact exists.

Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Pigott, Jr., Balio and Fallon, JJ.


Summaries of

Herman v. Town of Clarence

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Herman v. Town of Clarence

Case Details

Full title:AUDREY J. HERMAN et al., Respondents, v. TOWN OF CLARENCE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
688 N.Y.S.2d 456

Citing Cases

Ramos v. Howard Indus

ponent's proof ( McArthur v Muhammad, 27 AD3d 532, 533; see George Larkin Trucking Co. v Lisbon Tire Mart,…

Pagano v. Rite-Aid Corp.

Plaintiffs seek to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained by Mary Lou Pagano (plaintiff) when she…