From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herman et al. v. Peacock

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Nov 9, 1931
137 So. 704 (Fla. 1931)

Opinion

Opinion filed November 9, 1931.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; H. F. Atkinson, Judge.

Affirmed.

Harry Gordon and Leo Rosen, for Appellants;

R. A. Johnston, for Appellee.


This is an appeal from a final decree in a suit to foreclose a mortgage. Error is predicated on the final decree, the decree confirming the sale, the appointment of a receiver, refusal to vacate the order appointing the receiver, and the decree striking a portion of appellant's answer.

We have examined each of these assignments and while the procedure was not in every respect regular and in conformity with good practice, such procedural errors as were possibly committed were harmless and the final decree reached a just conclusion. It is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Herman et al. v. Peacock

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Nov 9, 1931
137 So. 704 (Fla. 1931)
Case details for

Herman et al. v. Peacock

Case Details

Full title:M. B. HERMAN, and ARTHUR N. HERMAN and BESSIE HERMAN, his wife…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Nov 9, 1931

Citations

137 So. 704 (Fla. 1931)
137 So. 704

Citing Cases

Special v. Baux

This interpretation of the harmless error statute focused on the legislative purpose of conserving judicial…