From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heritage Bank Creditor v. Cook (In re Cook)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Brunswick Division
Nov 4, 2014
CASE NUMBER 14-20547 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Nov. 4, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER 14-20547

11-04-2014

IN RE: JOYCE ANN COOK, Debtor THE HERITAGE BANK Creditor/Movant v. JOYCE ANN COOK Debtor THE ESTATE OF WILLENE MCNAIR Codebtor M. ELAINA MASSEY Chapter 13 Trustee Respondents


CHAPTER 13 OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CODEBTOR RELIEF FROM STAY MOTION

This matter is before me on Heritage Bank's Motion for Relief from the Codebtor Stay. The Motion is dismissed because the codebtor stay only protects codebtors who are individuals under the Bankruptcy Code.

FINDINGS OF FACT

On April 21, 2006, Joyce Ann Cook ("Debtor") executed a note in favor of Heritage Bank in the amount of $57, 186.50 ("Mortgage"). (ECF No. 34 ¶ 2.) The Mortgage is secured by a perfected security interest in real property purchased by the Debtor at 800 Elim Church Road NE, Ludowici, GA ("Collateral"). (Sch. D of ECF No. 1.)

References to the chapter 13 case docket appear in the following format: (ECF No. ___.)

Willene McNair was listed as a co-obligor on the Mortgage. (Id.) Following Ms. McNair's death in February 2012, the Estate of Willene McNair now stands as the co-obligor on the Mortgage. (ECF No. 34 ¶ 6.)

The Debtor filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy relief on June 17, 2014. (ECF No. 1.) Heritage Bank filed a Proof of Claim for $45,421.84. (Claim No. 1, Jun. 19, 2014.) As of the commencement of the case, the Collateral was valued at $68,729.00. (Sch. A of ECF No. 1.)

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code includes a stay of action against a codebtor. 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). This provision stays the efforts of a creditor to collect a debt from an individual codebtor without first requesting stay relief:

(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, after the order for relief under this chapter, a creditor may not act, or commence or continue any civil action, to collect all or any part of a consumer debt of the debtor from any individual that is liable on such debt with the debtor, or that secured such debt, unless -



(1) such individual became liable on or secured such debt in the ordinary course of such individual's business; or



(2) the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to a case under chapter 7 or 11 of this title.
Id. (emphasis added).

A decedent estate is not an individual under the Bankruptcy Code. See In re Estate of Patterson, 64 B.R. 807, 808 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1986)(Estates are not "persons."); In re Brown's Estate, 16 B.R. 128, 128 (Bankr. D.D.C. 1981)(A probate estate is not an individual person within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code.); but see In re Case, 148 B.R. 901, 902 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1992) (Decedent's estate is an individual because it is the extension of an individual natural person.).

The Bankruptcy Code does not define the term individual. The Bankruptcy Code does, however, define the term "entity." 11 U.S.C. § 101(15).

I have previously ruled that Congress generally uses the word "individual" to distinguish natural persons from corporations and partnerships. See Georgia Scale Co. v. Toledo Scale Corp. (In re Georgia Scale Co.), 134 B.R. 69, 70 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1991).
--------

The definition of entity includes a "person"—which includes "individual, partnership and corporation," 11 U.S.C. § 101(41)—and "estate, trust, governmental unit, and the United States Trustee," 11 U.S.C. § 101(15).

A decedent estate is an entity, not a person, under the Bankruptcy Code. 11 U.S.C. § 101(15). If Congress intended the definition of person to include an estate, it would not have listed "estate" as a separate category within the definition of entity. See David B. Young, The Intersection of Bankruptcy and Probate, 49 S. Tex. L. Rev. 351, 366 (2007); see also In re McKniqht, 136 B.R. 891, 894 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1992) (quoting Lauqhlin v. U.S. I.R.S., 98 B.R. 494, 496 (D.Neb.1989), aff'd, 912 F.2d 197 (8th Cir.l990)("A basic doctrine of statutory construction declares that where possible, two statutes must be read so as to give meaning to each statute.")).

Entities are not covered by the codebtor stay in a chapter 13 case. See 11 U.S.C. § 1301. Therefore, the codebtor stay does not apply to the Estate of Willene McNair as a co-obligor on the Mortgage. Contra In re Case, 148 B.R. at 904 (ruling codebtor stay applies to an estate, but granting relief from the stay under 11 U.S.C. § 1301(c)).

ORDER

Having determined that that the chapter 13 codebtor stay does not apply to the Estate of Willene McNair, Heritage Bank's Motion for Relief from the Codebtor Stay is ORDERED DISMISSED.

/s/_________

JOHN S. DALIS

United States Bankruptcy Judge
Dated at Brunswick, Georgia, this 4th day of November, 2014.


Summaries of

Heritage Bank Creditor v. Cook (In re Cook)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Brunswick Division
Nov 4, 2014
CASE NUMBER 14-20547 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Nov. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Heritage Bank Creditor v. Cook (In re Cook)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: JOYCE ANN COOK, Debtor THE HERITAGE BANK Creditor/Movant v. JOYCE…

Court:UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Brunswick Division

Date published: Nov 4, 2014

Citations

CASE NUMBER 14-20547 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Nov. 4, 2014)

Citing Cases

Carter v. United States

on to seek refund); Pleconis v. I.R.S., No. CIV.A. 09-5970 SDWES, 2011 WL 3502057, at *7 (D.N.J. Aug. 10,…

Ga. United Credit Union v. Moore (In re Moore)

To the extent that the Court granted stay relief as to the estate of the Debtor's late mother, such relief…