Opinion
Argued October 16, 1894
Decided October 30, 1894
Theodore Bacon for appellant.
George Truesdale for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Herbst v. Vacuum Oil Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1894
143 N.Y. 671 (N.Y. 1894)
Summaries of
Herbst v. Vacuum Oil Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1894
143 N.Y. 671 (N.Y. 1894)
Case details for
Herbst v. Vacuum Oil Company
Case Details
Full title:LUDWIG HERBST, Respondent, v . THE VACUUM OIL COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 30, 1894
Citations
143 N.Y. 671 (N.Y. 1894)
Citing Cases
Smith v. Smith
The event is now with the plaintiff. ( Franey v. Smith, 126 N.Y. 658; Donovan v. Vandemark, 22 Hun, 307;…
Gonzales v. Pacific Greyhound LinesNor does it matter whether or not defendants' counsel, in discussing with plaintiff's counsel the issues to…