From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henzel v. P.B. and L. Assn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 27, 1937
128 Pa. Super. 531 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1937)

Opinion

October 1, 1937.

October 27, 1937.

Building and loan associations — Stockholders — Inspection of list of stockholders — Act of May 5, 1933, P.L. 457 — Construction.

1. Under the Building and Loan Code of May 5, 1933, P.L. 457, the stockholders of building and loan associations are not deprived of the common law right of stockholders of corporations generally to inspect the list of stockholders or be furnished with a list of them.

2. The Act of 1933 will not be construed as limiting the rights of stockholders to those specifically enumerated except where the intention to do so is clear.

Pleading — Demurrer — Admissions.

3. A demurrer admits the truth of the relevant and material facts averred in the pleading demurred to; it does not admit their sufficiency, nor does it admit irrelevant and immaterial matter pleaded, nor the legal conclusions or inferences sought to be drawn from the facts.

Appeal, No. 126, Oct. T., 1937, from judgment of C.P. No. 5, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1936, No. 4470, in case of Frank Henzel et al. v. Patterson Building and Loan Association No. 2 et al.

Before KELLER, P.J., CUNNINGHAM, BALDRIGE, STADTFELD, PARKER, JAMES and RHODES, JJ. Judgment affirmed.

Mandamus proceeding.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

Demurrer to return to petition sustained and judgment entered for plaintiffs directing issuance of writ of mandamus, opinion by SMITH, P.J. Defendant appealed.

Error assigned, among others, was judgment.

Emanuel Moss, of Moss Moss, for appellant.

Herbert L. Maris, for appellee.


Argued October 1, 1937.


This appeal is ruled by the decisions of the Supreme Court in Drovin v. Lehigh Coal Navigation Co., 265 Pa. 447, 109 A. 128; Hauser v. York Water Co., 278 Pa. 387, 123 A. 330; Kuhbach v. Irving Cut Glass Co., 220 Pa. 427, 69 A. 981.

The mere fact that the Building and Loan Code of 1933 — (Act of May 5, 1933, P.L. 457) — does not specifically provide that stockholders of building and loan associations shall have the right to inspect the list of stockholders, or be furnished with a list of them, will not be applied so as to deprive them of a common-law right enjoyed by stockholders of corporations generally. The code will not be construed as limiting the rights of stockholders to those specifically enumerated except where the intention to do so is clear. Their right to inspect the list of stockholders of the association is not affected by the fact that our Supreme Court has held (Brown v. Victor Bldg. Assn., 302 Pa. 254, 258, 259, 153 A. 349; Stone v. Schiller B. L. Assn., 302 Pa. 544, 551, 153 A. 758) that as between themselves share holders of building and loan associations occupy, in some respects, the status of partners. The rights of a partner, in this respect, are certainly not inferior to those of a stockholder, but the Supreme Court, in those cases, was not dealing with the corporate rights of stockholders of building and loan associations.

A demurrer admits the truth of the relevant and material facts averred in the pleading demurred to. It does not admit their sufficiency, nor does it admit irrelevant and immaterial matter pleaded, nor the legal conclusions or inferences sought to be drawn from the facts: Chester City v. Paxson, 76 Pa. Super. 40, 45.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Henzel v. P.B. and L. Assn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 27, 1937
128 Pa. Super. 531 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1937)
Case details for

Henzel v. P.B. and L. Assn

Case Details

Full title:Henzel et al. v. Patterson Building and Loan Association No. 2 et al…

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 27, 1937

Citations

128 Pa. Super. 531 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1937)
194 A. 683

Citing Cases

Durnin v. Allentown Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n

United States v. Harper, 241 F.2d 103 (7th Cir., 1957); People of State of California v. Coast Federal…

White v. Smith

We perceive no sound reason why stockholders in private corporations should be permitted to know the names of…