From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henson v. Whorf

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 7, 1985
466 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 83-1548.

February 7, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Citrus County, William F. Edwards, J.

Bonnie S. Newton, Seminole, for appellants.

John Russell, Homosassa Springs, and W.T. Green, Crystal River, for appellees, Whorf.


It was error to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute (Rule 1.420(e), Fla.R. Civ.P.) when it is clear that there was record activity within the year preceding the filing of appellee's motion to dismiss. Nektaredes v. Sagonias, 432 So.2d 769 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Even had it been proper to do so, a dismissal under that rule should be without prejudice. Bair v. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc., 387 So.2d 517 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

The order of dismissal is

REVERSED.

ORFINGER, FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Henson v. Whorf

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 7, 1985
466 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Henson v. Whorf

Case Details

Full title:MARION E. HENSON AND MALBA H. BROWN, APPELLANTS, v. CHARLES F. WHORF, ET…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 7, 1985

Citations

466 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Allen

However, such a dismissal under rule 1.420(e) must be without prejudice. See e.g., Kohly v. Wallach, 580…

State v. Sadler

The supreme court uses it in form 1.989 applicable to a judgment of dismissal for lack of prosecution, an…