From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry Stuart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 7, 1974
44 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

May 7, 1974


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 16, 1974, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to strike that portion of the final decretal paragraph which vacated the order of attachment previously obtained by Delor Fabrics, Inc., and to reinstate said order of attachment, and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. An order of attachment may be vacated pursuant to CPLR 6223 only upon a determination that it was illegally or improperly issued ( Green River Distilling Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co., 234 N.Y. 109; 7A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, par. 6223.01). Accordingly, since on a prior motion to vacate, it was determined that the order of attachment herein was properly issued, it was error for the court below to thereafter vacate pursuant to CPLR 6223. And, while discharge of an order of attachment (which assumes it validity — see Green River Distilling Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co., supra) may be obtained pursuant to CPLR 6222, it does not appear that defendant ever sought or obtained an order pursuant to that section approving the proposed undertaking submitted below, or indeed, that defendant complied with the procedures set forth therein, which among other things, requires "payment of the sheriff's fees and expenses."

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Kupferman, Murphy, Lupiano and Tilzer, JJ.


Summaries of

Henry Stuart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 7, 1974
44 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Henry Stuart

Case Details

Full title:HENRY STUART (FABRICS) LTD., Plaintiff, v. JULES MOSKOWITZ CO., INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 7, 1974

Citations

44 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

New York Auction Co. v. Belt

It is an established practice in this State to vacate attachments not only where the attachment is…

Manufacturers Traders Tr. Co. v. Lowenstein

We find no error in denying the motion to vacate plaintiff's order of attachment. "An order of attachment may…