From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henninger v. Clay

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 19, 1956
4 Misc. 2d 795 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)

Opinion

December 19, 1956

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, MURRAY H. PEARLMAN, J.

Lawrence M. Honig for appellant.

Milton Gelman for respondent.


According to the testimony the rent was due and payable on September 29, 1956. The tenant was not in default until the end of that day; therefore the service of the petition and precept on September 29, 1956 was premature.

The final order and judgment should be unanimously reversed, upon the law and facts, with $10 costs to tenant, and petition dismissed.

PETTE, HART and DI GIOVANNA, JJ., concur.

Final order and judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Henninger v. Clay

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 19, 1956
4 Misc. 2d 795 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)
Case details for

Henninger v. Clay

Case Details

Full title:RUDOLPH HENNINGER, Landlord, Respondent, v. JOHN CLAY, Tenant, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1956

Citations

4 Misc. 2d 795 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)
162 N.Y.S.2d 230

Citing Cases

In re Andover Togs, Inc.

Under New York law, when a lease provides that a tenant is obligated to make a rent payment on a specified…

Computer v. Commodore Machs

In fact, the note specifically states that most of the money was only "due" thereafter and only $50,000 was…